 |
| NASA KSC 24-meter outer diameter liquid hydrogen dewar under construction in 2020 (left) and internal design (right)* |
I co-founded my sixth technology based startup in early 2016 after ending a thirty-one year career at NASA. The new company was focused on hydrogen as the sustainable solution to our global challenges in the energy, mobility, food, and water nexus. This was a natural fit for my expertise and experience developing liquid, slush, and gaseous hydrogen systems since the mid-1980s.
My business partner and I spent several years developing hydrogen system designs for various applications in the energy, agriculture, aerospace, and transportation market sectors. It was the classic Venn diagram overlap of our personal passions, unique capabilities, and the most urgent global needs. However, the general feedback at the time was that despite our unique expertise with these systems there was insufficient impetus to transition to widespread hydrogen use.
Historically, the hydrogen community has been small and concentrated. Early work with liquid hydrogen systems and applications was well underway in the U.S. in the 1950s at NBS (now NIST) and NACA (the precursor to NASA). The space industry has been the largest user of liquid hydrogen since the 1960s; supported by the cryogenic liquiefied gas production companies and prime aerospace contractors; and largely funded by the space and defense agencies of a few countries. Over time, an established supply chain of hydrogen technology, component and subsystem providers has developed. Other commodity users of hydrogen also emerged in steel making, food processing, semiconductor fabrication, and various research facilities.
This state of affairs changed dramatically in the past few years with an unprecedented growth in interest and investments in hydrogen systems for transitioning the global economy away from greenhouse gas emitting fuels. Unfortunately, the newfound interest in hydrogen has brought with it newly self-proclaimed experts. Organizations and individuals with little or no hydrogen experience - and who in some cases openly dismissed hydrogen just a few years ago - are now clamoring for related government funding. Startups are attracting large capital investments for hydrogen applications despite often lacking personnel with any significant relevant experience.
As a result, conversations around the transition to hydrogen frequently become mired in strongly held opinions rather than evidence-based reality. Some factions are hyping their own hydrogen system concepts without the requisite knowledge to assess the associated technical and economic feasibility, let alone the risks. At the other end of the spectrum are vehement hydrogen detractors who make hand waving arguments rooted in misinformation. They also often have a vested interest in legacy systems or competing technologies that are threatened by hydrogen.
In upcoming posts, I'll attempt to separate the signal from the noise based on more than 35 years of designing, developing, and deploying hydrogen systems as large as 4732 cubic meters of usable liquid hydrogen with zero boil-off losses*. The goal is to provide a clear-eyed perspective on transitioning to the liquid hydrogen era, and demonstrate that there are no true technology gaps preventing the widespread use of liquid hydrogen. Rather, the remaining challenges relate to experienced systems engineering, capital investments, competitive business models, market acceptance, public policy, and regulatory maturation.
*References:
- Fesmire and Swanger, "Overview of the New LH2 Sphere at NASA Kennedy Space Center", DOE/NASA Advances in Liquid Hydrogen Storage Workshop, Aug, 2021.
- Moran, "No-Loss Liquid Hydrogen and LNG Systems (Zero Boil-Off)", May 12, 2018. (https://blog.matthewemoran.com/2018/05/no-loss-liquid-hydrogen-and-lng-systems.html)
