 |
| Download full report |
The Hydrogen Innovation Initiative has released an outstanding resource that can be accessed at the above caption link. Kudos to the individuals who created this well-done primer! Some quick notes on a few of the topics based on my experiences [1]:
3.1 Hazards. The high diffusivity of H2 combined with 20 m/s rise rate in air at ambient temperature makes leaks much less hazardous than many fuels in some regards. My three mantras for all H2 systems are: prevent leaks, provide ventilation, and eliminate ignition sources. It's worth noting that the H2 lower flammability range in air is not much different than methane (natural gas); and it's detonation lower limit range is more than 3 times greater than methane. LH2 pools should only occur in catastrophic accidents and do not last long in practice. Resulting cold vapor clouds are transient but a serious hazard until they warm and rise. For ambient temperature H2, there are no flammable clouds only flammable leak source jets.
3.2 Ignition consequences. Infrared (IR) detectors and cameras should be used to detect and check for any ignited H2 leaks or flare stack operations (although, they are generally visible at night or in dark locations). The low thermal radiance compared to other fuel fires is due to the lack of soot particles and allows first responders to get closer to the flame if needed.
3.3 Pressure system hazards. Phase change from liquid to vapor at 1 bar results in a 53-fold increase in specific volume which can quickly cause overpressure in an improperly designed or operated LH2 system. The 1:848 expansion ratio is a bit misleading since it assumes the GH2 warms to ambient which would take quite a while to occur in a properly insulated vessel or pipeline. BLEVE is an interesting topic. I've run many thousands of LH2 tests over the years with significant flashing occurring in a receiving tank or vent line exit and never saw any evidence of it. The conditions where it may happen seem to be uncertain at this time.
3.4 Cryogenic hazards. In a properly designed and operated LH2 system, cold burns, hypothermia, and asphyxiation are extremely unlikely. But they must be guarded against like any other hazard. Proper piping and component design and insulation; no enclosed spaces where hydrogen can accumulate; and personal protective equipment (PPE) for any personnel who may be exposed to cryogenic surface during maintenance, etc. Also worth noting: although H2 is an asphyxiant if enough oxygen is displaced, it is not toxic. In fact, breathing gas mixtures for deep diving have used H2. RPT seems similar to BLEVE - a possible scenario but not proven for any specific conditions yet.
4.2 Component level design. Common insulation systems for LH2 include a vacuum jacket with insulation in the vacuum such as MLI, glass bubbles, perlite, or various aerogel formulations. Foam is only appropriate for launch vehicles or potentially other "load-and-go" high consumption applications that can tolerate the poor thermal performance (none currently outside of the space industry that I'm aware of). There is some recent R&D for non-vacuum LH2 insulation that has not been publicly tested or quantified yet. Until it is, vacuum jackets for any LH2 system vessel, transfer piping, and components in contact with the LH2 are a must unless you build rockets (or something with similar requirements). A common MLI construction is layers of double aluminized mylar with dacron netting between them. Approximately 30 layers with a thickness of 2.5 cm can get below 1 W/m^2 heat flux between 300 K and 20 K surfaces in a hard vacuum. Nothing provides near zero conductivity, unfortunately, but MLI in a hard vacuum is the best performing option.
5 Material considerations. While some materials become more brittle at LH2 temperatures (e.g., carbon steel, most plastics, most body-centered cubic metals), others retain their ductility (e.g., aluminum alloys, austenitic stainless with > 7% nickel, and most face-centered cubic metals). However, yield and ultimate strength actually increase generally for most solids; while elastic modulus and fatigue strength varies. Also worth noting is that many material and thermal properties of solids change in a highly nonlinear fashion as a function of temperature in the cryogenic range. This results in the need to integrate properties such as thermal conductivity and specific heat over the temperature range of interest when performing design calculations or modeling. A good deal of historical cryogenic materials testing was done and compiled by NASA, Purdue, NBS/NIST and other sources in addition to the ones mentioned. Coupon sample testing of any new materials, alloys, or processes is critical (especially any additively manufactured structures).
References
[1] Liquid Hydrogen Systems Course, 2025.
Author Bio
